[Standards] Nonzas: What are they and do we need them?
georg at op-co.de
Mon Apr 20 16:39:51 UTC 2015
* Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> [2015-04-20 18:33]:
> > In the XEP-0352 case, "Nonzas" could get lost without resending them
> > upon stream resumption, leaving the client under the impression that
> > it's active, although the server thinks it's inactive.
> This can't happen, because new streams are always active by default. I
> really thought this was clear in the XEP, but actually it's a little
> bit ambiguous.
This looks to me like a restriction caused by using nonzas in the first
place (and the inability to track them in 0198), not like something
which makes sense from a protocol desgin view point.
As a client developer, I would expect the stream to be in the same state
it was before resumption, as stream resumption is caused by network
interruptions and has nothing to do with user/client activity.
|| http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++
|| gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ ||
|| Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? ||
++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Standards