[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0327 (Rayo)

Matthew A. Miller linuxwolf at outer-planes.net
Wed Apr 29 18:58:35 UTC 2015

Hash: SHA512

Patches should be submitted to editor at xmpp.org.  We can take it from
here this time, though (-:

XEP-143 briefly goes over it, but I think we'll need to reexamine and
update that document soon.

- -- 
- - m&m

Matthew A. Miller
< http://goo.gl/LK55L >

On 4/29/15 12:51 PM, Ben Langfeld wrote:
> How would you like those submitting? The link is to a git patch
> which can be applied upstream.
> On 29 April 2015 at 12:26, Philipp Hancke
> <fippo at goodadvice.pages.de <mailto:fippo at goodadvice.pages.de>>
> wrote:
> Am 17.04.2015 um 11:48 schrieb Ben Langfeld:
> Changes suggested to this specification in this thread, with the 
> exception of those deferred to v2, are available at 
> https://github.com/rayo/xmpp/compare/1b4ee7f...feature/rayo.patch
> ah... LGTM. Can you resubmit please?
> (if I had only said that before the council meeting)
> +1 for advancing with those changes.
> On 6 April 2015 at 11:26, XMPP Extensions Editor <editor at xmpp.org
> <mailto:editor at xmpp.org>> wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0327 (Rayo).
> Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for
> the third-party control of telephone calls and other similar media
> sessions. The protocol includes support for session 
> management/signaling, as well as advanced media resources such as
> speech recognizers, speech synthesizers and audio/video recorders.
> The protocol serves a different purpose from that of first-party
> protocols such as Jingle or SIP, and is compatible with those
> protocols.
> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0327.html
> This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business
> on 2015-04-17.
> Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and
> send your feedback to the standards at xmpp.org 
> <mailto:standards at xmpp.org> discussion list:
> 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol
> stack or to clarify an existing protocol? 2. Does the specification
> solve the problem stated in the introduction and requirements? 3.
> Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not,
> why not? 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this 
> specification? 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly
> written?
> Your feedback is appreciated!
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org


More information about the Standards mailing list