[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle HTTP Transport Method

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Thu Aug 27 10:02:39 UTC 2015


Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:38:35 -0700
Lance Stout <lancestout at gmail.com> wrote:

> To that end, I submitted an update to XEP-0264 today to get it out of
> the Deferred state, allow it to use other URI types, and expand its
> scope to more than just file transfer thumbnails (for example,
> attaching a thumbnail preview to RTP video streams). A rendered
> version of the PR is available at
> http://legastero.github.io/customxeps/extensions/xep-0264.html.

Looks nice, thank you. I wish Council would accept the changes despite
Marcus (the author) is inactive for a very long time.

> Use within MUC is an issue with any Jingle session type and
> transport. XEP-0358 (Publishing Available Jingle Sessions, aka
> JinglePub) is intended as a solution for that problem. JinglePub
> works via a similar mechanism as what is proposed in
> https://github.com/processone/ejabberd-saas-docs/blob/master/xmpp-specs/http-filetransfer/http-filetransfer.md,
> but is usable with any type of Jingle session.

An example for a MUC case would be appreciated. From the XEP I
understood nothing. Also, how will this interact with legacy clients
(old unsupported XMPP clients, mostly 95% of all clients)? In the case
of HTTP Upload any client will be able at least to see the link and
download the file.

> Starting a Jingle session with an offline user is naturally an issue
> with any Jingle session type. Using XEP-0353 (Jingle Message
> Initiation) or XEP-0358 in combination with XEP-0357 (Push
> Notifications) is intended as a foundation for a general solution.

I don't think XEP-0353 (Jingle Message Initiation) will help because it
requires the initiator to be available in order to receive
message-accept which is not always the case. I'm not sure if XEP-0357
(Push Notifications) may help here, I thought it was designed for a
different purpose.



More information about the Standards mailing list