[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: SRV records for XMPP over TLS

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Dec 9 10:58:52 UTC 2015


I think this looks good, though I think:

- The SRV label form probably ought to follow the precedent set by RFC
6186, even though I think that's uglier.
- I'm not at all convinced by abusing SNI in lieu of ALPN.

On 8 December 2015 at 17:39, XMPP Extensions Editor <editor at xmpp.org> wrote:

> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: SRV records for XMPP over TLS
>
> Abstract: This specification defines a procedure to look up _tls SRV
> records in addition to _tcp and mix weights/priorities.
>
> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/tls-srv.html
>
> The XMPP Council will decide in the next two weeks whether to accept this
> proposal as an official XEP.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151209/9c36a44c/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list