[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Multi-User Chat Light

Stefan Strigler stefan.strigler at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 17:11:37 UTC 2015


Hi,

2015-12-14 17:06 GMT+00:00 Tobias M <tmarkmann at googlemail.com>:

>
> On 14.12.2015, at 17:56, Stefan Strigler <stefan.strigler at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> if you want to do IQ with members of a room in the context of MUC Light
> you would do so by addressing them directly since there is no concept of
> anonymous or semi-anonymous rooms.
>
>
> True. Forgot about that. So is there also the requirement that every
> member of the light MUC is already subscribed to the presence of the other
> members via their roster? Then it’d make sense to not distribute the
> presence and IQ again through the light MUC, as everybody has the real JIDs.
>

That's out of scope. We could allow to also broadcast presence through a
room (and I have done that actually), but that should not be mandatory. To
find out about someone's presence there might be many approaches like
direct presence, presence subscription, last activity and so on.

Cheers,

Stefan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151214/53a5ca43/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list