[Standards] namespace versioning for XEP-0176

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Dec 16 15:56:26 UTC 2015


On 12/15/15 1:29 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 15.12.2015 um 04:59 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>> On 12/10/15 9:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Philipp Hancke
>>> <fippo at goodadvice.pages.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have concerns with this approach?
>>>>
>>>> WFM. I suppose the bigger change is going to be the addition of and
>>>> end-of-candidates element?
>>>
>>> Yes, that is an informational message in the provisional text I am
>>> working on. I would post an example but I am away from my computer
>>> right now. :-)
>>
>> Here's that example:
>>
>> <iq from='juliet at capulet.example/yn0cl4bnw0yr3vym'
>>      id='xv39z423'
>>      to='romeo at montague.example/dr4hcr0st3lup4c'
>>      type='set'>
>>    <jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle:1'
>>            action='transport-info'
>>            initiator='romeo at montague.example/dr4hcr0st3lup4c'
>>            sid='a73sjjvkla37jfea'>
>>      <transport-state
>>            xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle:transports:ice:info:0'
>>            state='completed'/>
>>    </jingle>
>> </iq>
>
> I think this needs to be wrapped in a <content/>
> -- see how the trickle-ice (sip?) draft deals with mids.
>
> transport-state is ambiguous. This is easy to misinterpret in the WebRTC
> terminology since there is an ice connection state 'completed' as well
> as an ice gathering state 'completed'.
>
>     <gathering-complete xmlns=.../>
>
> I doubt it is useful to signal other gathering states.

Agreed.

Peter



More information about the Standards mailing list