[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle ICE Transport Method

Philipp Hancke fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Thu Dec 17 12:49:39 UTC 2015

oh... just noticed this introduces types for tcp-active etc.
This is rather unfortunate as there can be candidates of type host with 
protocol udp and a tcptype active. Mapping this seems complicated, i'd 
prefer to have a separate tcptype attribute.

Also, the 6544 reference is not work in progress ;-)

And since i'm currently dealing with ice-lite:
	For the purposes of the Jingle ICE-UDP Transport Method, both
	parties are full ICE implementations and therefore the
	controlling role MUST be assumed by the initiator and the
	controlled role MUST be assumed by the responder.
We might want to introduce a way to use ice-lite.

More information about the Standards mailing list