[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle ICE Transport Method
fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Thu Dec 17 12:49:39 UTC 2015
oh... just noticed this introduces types for tcp-active etc.
This is rather unfortunate as there can be candidates of type host with
protocol udp and a tcptype active. Mapping this seems complicated, i'd
prefer to have a separate tcptype attribute.
Also, the 6544 reference is not work in progress ;-)
And since i'm currently dealing with ice-lite:
For the purposes of the Jingle ICE-UDP Transport Method, both
parties are full ICE implementations and therefore the
controlling role MUST be assumed by the initiator and the
controlled role MUST be assumed by the responder.
We might want to introduce a way to use ice-lite.
More information about the Standards