[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Jingle ICE Transport Method

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Dec 17 15:32:08 UTC 2015

Oh and a separate tcptype attribute seems fine. 

Not so sure about ice-lite yet...

Sent from mobile, might be terse 

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Philipp Hancke <fippo at goodadvice.pages.de> wrote:
> oh... just noticed this introduces types for tcp-active etc.
> This is rather unfortunate as there can be candidates of type host with protocol udp and a tcptype active. Mapping this seems complicated, i'd prefer to have a separate tcptype attribute.
> Also, the 6544 reference is not work in progress ;-)
> And since i'm currently dealing with ice-lite:
>    For the purposes of the Jingle ICE-UDP Transport Method, both
>    parties are full ICE implementations and therefore the
>    controlling role MUST be assumed by the initiator and the
>    controlled role MUST be assumed by the responder.
> We might want to introduce a way to use ice-lite.
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________

More information about the Standards mailing list