[Standards] Move CSI to Last Call ("Proposed")

Edwin Mons jsf at edwinm.ik.nu
Tue Jul 28 09:11:47 UTC 2015


On 28/07/15 11:05, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>     > Also, why wrap the server notification in a message,
>
>     And not using a Nonza? Because most libraries provide a mechanism for
>     callbacks matching a given filter only for Stanzas. It's my impression
>     as as XMPP client library developer, that we don't want Nonzas to
>     trigger callbacks on the client side, as it would increase the
>     complexity of XMPP client software stacks.
>
>
> It's very wrong.
>
> Consider a case where the client goes active, then switches to
> inactive but loses connection and recovers via '198. The response -
> which is tightly bound to the session - would indicate that the client
> was inactive, but would arrive on a subsequent connection which is not
> inactive.

If you're doing in-band signalling, you really need to be able to
distinguish signals from actual data.  If you use stanzas, you're making
it very hard for yourself.

Edwin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20150728/055d6e52/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list