[Standards] {Core|Advanced} {Client|Server} 2015

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet peter at andyet.net
Wed Jun 17 22:17:39 UTC 2015

On 6/17/15 3:47 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 17 June 2015 at 22:41, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter at andyet.net
> <mailto:peter at andyet.net>> wrote:
>     On 6/17/15 3:33 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>         I meant to say that Carbons wasn't even on there before, whereas
>         it's
>         now pretty much essential.
>     Agreed with respect to the technology. With respect to the process,
>     the Carbons XEP is still Experimental. I think that it's not right
>     to make a XEP part of a compliance suite if it's still Experimental.
>     But that can be solved by moving the XEP forward on the standards track.
> Well, I think it's OK (and possibly even useful) to include Experimental
> extensions in the compliance suite while the suite is itself Experimental.
> As I said to Sam, I think it'd be useful to build the shopping list, and
> then we can figure out where additional work is needed.

Sure. :-)

More information about the Standards mailing list