[Standards] XEP-0234 Jingle File Transfer 0.16
jefry.reyes at gmail.com
Sun Jun 28 12:37:52 UTC 2015
I vote for not moving towards supporting :4. There isn't a compelling
reason to do it. So it is better to wait until (or if) there features
are supported in the next version or in some other XEP.
On 20/06/15 16:13, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2015-06-20 21:59 GMT+02:00 Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org
> <mailto:asterix at lagaule.org>>:
> That will also break compatibility with clients that supports only :3
> namespace, but currently we don't work with clients that have :4
> namespace implemented. implementing several version of a protocol is
> quite complexe.
> Thats basically the reason I'm asking. My client Conversations
> currently only supports :3 and I'm not going to support both however I
> would upgrade to :4 if gajim were to do so as well and thus making
> Conversations compatible with Swift.
> (Gajim, Conversations and Swift - to my knowledge - are the only
> clients supporting Jingle FT)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards