[Standards] 2016 Compliance Suites

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet peter at andyet.net
Sat Oct 10 18:27:50 UTC 2015


On 10/10/15 11:11 AM, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Curtis King <cking at mumbo.ca> wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2015, at 3:33 AM, Ralph Meijer <ralphm at ik.nu> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that the latter three examples are nice to have, but I don't
>> agree that Carbons, Chat States or CSI are nice to haves at this point
>> in time.
>>
>> Thats your point of view not mine nor our customers. That’s the problem with
>> the XEP it has a very narrow scope, just like carbons.
>
>
> I think it makes sense to remove chat states and delivery receipts
> since they don't really do anything but give you a nice UI indicator.

But nice UI indicators are what people care about. :-)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/


More information about the Standards mailing list