[Standards] Deprecating Privacy Lists

Ben Langfeld ben at langfeld.me
Mon Oct 12 16:48:34 UTC 2015

On 12 October 2015 at 13:15, Vitaly Takmazov <vitalyster at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Take a look at the list of RFC and XEP authors for starters.
> That list is VERY short. And most authors have 15+ years of experience
> in related technologies.
> Indeed, there are some extensions from "beginners" but they are not
> widely adopted.
> > subscription for new ones to be written based on their requirements.
> "Subscription fee" for writing an XEP is **the time**.

I don't think you understood this.

> As I described
> in previous message -
> it is cheaper to write some domain-specific protocol from scratch,
> rather than adopt XMPP in that current outdated state.

What is your suggested solution to making XMPP easier to contribute to?

> > open-source entitlement.
> I have mention that now is 2015 - "you should use XMPP just because it
> is driven by open community"
> is not an answer in 2015: there are MANY open communities with open
> specs and opensource libraries.
> XMPP still lost it 2003.
> ---
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20151012/aee5f47b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list