[Standards] Deprecating Privacy Lists

Sam Whited sam at samwhited.com
Fri Oct 23 18:08:54 UTC 2015


In that case it sounds like this is a great opportunity for them to
create standards that actually meet the needs of the social-networking
crowd instead of relying on a single monolithic one-size-fits-all
standard.

—Sam

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Genghis Khan <genghiskhan at gmx.ca> wrote:
> I do not know how many of you heard of social networking platforms that
> are based on XMPP, such as Movim and Salut à Toi
>
> By deprecating XEP-0016, even if it does not mean nullification, we
> might harm progress of XMPP based social networks.  Not only that the
> centralized social networks deprecate and even actively destroy user
> privacy, they do not seem to allow powerful privacy feature such as
> XEP-0016.
>
> Another reason to keep XEP-0016 until further corresponding
> advancements be made is to protect this almost exclusive potential that
> is now reserved to social networking platforms based on XMPP.
>
> Also, if you think that XEP-0016, due to its complicity or flexibility
> rate, is resulting in bad code or implementation, please update XEP-0016
> with a new section that would provide a proper UI guidelines to handle it;
> UI may be a filter dialog such of Email clients (e.g. Claws Mail and
> Sylpheed).
>
> Posts I legitimize or agree with:
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030396.html Florian Schmaus
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030397.html Goffi
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030398.html Christian Schudt
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030400.html Goffi
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030429.html Evgeny Khramtsov
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030434.html Evgeny Khramtsov
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030438.html Evgeny Khramtsov
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030460.html Christian Schudt
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030466.html Evgeny Khramtsov
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030481.html Evgeny Khramtsov
> http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-October/030484.html Evgeny Khramtsov
>
> I strongly suggest not to deprecate XEP-0016 yet.
>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 11:02 PM
>> From: "Sam Whited" <sam at samwhited.com>
>> To: "XMPP Standards" <standards at xmpp.org>
>> Subject: [Standards] Deprecating Privacy Lists
>>
>> I've brought up reconciling privacy lists and the blocking command in
>> the past [1], but the discussion faltered and it never went before the
>> council. It was brought up as part of a recent discussion again [2],
>> and I'd like to formally propose that it be deprecated.
>>
>> I have made a pull request here: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/104
>>
>> As I see it, privacy lists are complicated and don't work well with
>> the blocking command in practice. As an example, if I block a user (on
>> an ejabberd server) in Gajim (which uses privacy lists), and then view
>> the same user in Conversations (which suports the blocking command),
>> that user does not appear blocked because Gajim's privacy list is
>> slightly different from what the server considers "blocked" so it's
>> never mapped to the privacy lists.
>>
>> The majority of the functionality of privacy lists is covered by
>>
>> - XEP-0191: Blocking command
>> - XEP-0186: Invisibility
>>
>> While privacy lists do have other functionality, it is rarely used.
>>
>> Deprecating privacy lists will simplify the XMPP stack and remove one
>> more interop issue between clients which implement different
>> protocols, and I'd like to request that it be taken up and discussed
>> by the council.
>>
>> Best,
>> Sam
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2014-December/029402.html
>> [2]: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030358.html
>>
>> --
>> Sam Whited
>> pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
>> https://blog.samwhited.com
>>



-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
https://blog.samwhited.com


More information about the Standards mailing list