[Standards] XEP-0280: <private/> vs. <no-copy/>
kurt.zeilenga at isode.com
Wed Sep 16 15:35:27 UTC 2015
Are the semantics equivalent? <no-copy/> is just a hint. <private/> has a "MUST NOT deliver forwarded messages” requirement on it. And the latter also has a “SHOULD remove” recommendation on it.
> On Sep 16, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Matthew A. Miller <linuxwolf at outer-planes.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> A pull request was submitted to remove <private/> and use the
> <no-copy/> processing hint: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/83
> The last time this came up, many many months ago, I recall there not
> being consensus to change. But that was then and this is now.
> What are implementers doing today?
> * Are implementations using XEP-0280's <private/>?
> * Are implementations using XEP-0334's <no-copy/>?
> * Are implementations supporting both, but favoring XEP-0334's <no-copy/
> - --
> - - m&m
> Matthew A. Miller
> < http://goo.gl/LK55L >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards