[Standards] Deprecating Privacy Lists

Goffi goffi at goffi.org
Wed Sep 30 08:07:18 UTC 2015


I'm strongly against deprecating XEP-0016: we are working a lot with groups, 
and neither XEP-0191 nor XEP-0186 allow to block/be (in)visible only for a 
group.

I think a XEP should not be deprecated if its features are not superseeded by 
the new one(s).

thanks
Goffi

Le mardi 29 septembre 2015, 15:02:02 Sam Whited a écrit :
> I've brought up reconciling privacy lists and the blocking command in
> the past [1], but the discussion faltered and it never went before the
> council. It was brought up as part of a recent discussion again [2],
> and I'd like to formally propose that it be deprecated.
> 
> I have made a pull request here: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/104
> 
> As I see it, privacy lists are complicated and don't work well with
> the blocking command in practice. As an example, if I block a user (on
> an ejabberd server) in Gajim (which uses privacy lists), and then view
> the same user in Conversations (which suports the blocking command),
> that user does not appear blocked because Gajim's privacy list is
> slightly different from what the server considers "blocked" so it's
> never mapped to the privacy lists.
> 
> The majority of the functionality of privacy lists is covered by
> 
> - XEP-0191: Blocking command
> - XEP-0186: Invisibility
> 
> While privacy lists do have other functionality, it is rarely used.
> 
> Deprecating privacy lists will simplify the XMPP stack and remove one
> more interop issue between clients which implement different
> protocols, and I'd like to request that it be taken up and discussed
> by the council.
> 
> Best,
> Sam
> 
> 
> 
> [1]: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2014-December/029402.html
> [2]: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2015-September/030358.html



More information about the Standards mailing list