[Standards] MIX Subject and Room Info Nodes
steve.kille at isode.com
Mon Dec 5 15:40:23 UTC 2016
I would support removal of subject.
However, if a real need is identified, I can see merit in keeping it in the core XEP.
If there is not a clear consensus on the list, this can be the first topic for Brussels
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Standards [mailto:standards-bounces at xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Sam
> Sent: 05 December 2016 15:34
> To: XMPP Standards
> Subject: [Standards] MIX Subject and Room Info Nodes
> Hi all,
> I'm in the process of reviewing MIX and wanted to ask the communities
> opinion about the subject/info nodes.
> My initial thought on reading through the spec is that the subject node
> (§3.7.7 ) should be a part of the info node (§3.7.6 ). I asked Steve about
> this and he said the idea was that anyone could potentially chhange the
> subject while only certain users would have permission to change the room
> name / description (in the info node).
> So description would be a more "permanent" general description of the
> room, and the subject would change with the current conversation.
> I know there are (or have been in the past) some popular IRC rooms that
> operate this way, but in general I don't think it's a very popular use case, and
> I'm not sure it belongs in the core MIX XEP. I wonder how people would feel
> about removing the subject node entirely and just keeping the description
> field in the info node (which, as far as I can tell, is how most rooms use the
> MUC subject anyways). If it turns out this feature is in high demand after all,
> it could always be written up as a separate XEP or added back later.
> : https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0369.html#subject-node
> : https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0369.html#info-node
> Sam Whited
> pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
More information about the Standards