[Standards] Standard room configuration name for MUC MAM
kevin.smith at isode.com
Tue Jul 5 07:11:35 UTC 2016
On 4 Jul 2016, at 14:55, Holger Weiß <holger at zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Would people be fine with defining a standard name for a room
> configuration setting that enables/disables MUC MAM (e.g.,
> muc#roomconfig_mam)? That way, clients that don't want to present the
> full configuration form could offer a knob for that.
I think that, in general, a registry of common options is sensible (and ideally better defined than what’s currently in 45, which is a bit wooly in places).
> If nobody objects, I'd submit a PR against XEP-0045 (or should this
> rather go into XEP-0313?).
45’s the right place, I think, along with all the other standard options.
More information about the Standards