[Standards] Standard room configuration name for MUC MAM

Holger Weiß holger at zedat.fu-berlin.de
Tue Jul 5 08:00:14 UTC 2016

* Emmanuel Gil Peyrot <linkmauve at linkmauve.fr> [2016-07-05 08:24]:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Holger Weiß wrote:
> > Would people be fine with defining a standard name for a room
> > configuration setting that enables/disables MUC MAM (e.g.,
> > muc#roomconfig_mam)?  That way, clients that don't want to present the
> > full configuration form could offer a knob for that.
> Is there any reason not to reuse muc#roomconfig_enablelogging?

An XMPP service may well offer both public HTML logging and (in case of
members-only rooms) private MAM archiving, so I think you want separate
knobs for that.

> What you ultimately want to configure as a user is logging, not any
> specific protocol to access it, imo.

The difference is that the XMPP protocol offers adequate access control.


More information about the Standards mailing list