[Standards] MIX progress

Ashley Ward ashley.ward at surevine.com
Tue Jul 5 08:56:18 UTC 2016

> On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
> On 05.07.2016 10:08, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
>> Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:55:53 +0200
>> Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
>>> I'd also welcome if XEP development, especially for such an important
>>> one like MIX, would be more open.
>> For the record, we already have github XSF repo for that. We can keep
>> development there and tag stable version.
> So far, the XSF repo is *only* used for submitted XEPs, everything in
> inbox/ is a ProtoXEPs and XEPs with numbers follow the standards track.
> Changes are only made by the XSF Editor Team. It is not used for active
> development of those XEPs, and I think it should be that way.

For a while it’s been my vision that each XEP should have its own repo. The authors could then ‘own’ their own XEP repo - push to development branches, accept updates (to draft XEPs), etc. This would need a much higher level of automation than we have now though, and I just don’t have the bandwidth to do anything on it at the moment unfortunately.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20160705/844de100/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list