[Standards] MIX progress

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Tue Jul 5 09:24:21 UTC 2016

On 5 Jul 2016, at 10:22, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> On 5 July 2016 at 10:10, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
>> On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
>> > XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable.
>> To be fair, that isn’t what’s happening here, it’s just that Steve wants to double-check that the text reflects the Summit agreements before he submits.
> One could solve this by maintaining a branch (as a "working" PR) while the double-checking happens, for example. Plus, at this point, everyone will have forgotten the precise details of the Summit discussion anyway; publish-and-be-damned seems like a fine idea to me.
> I'd note that I don't think this is XEP development "behind closed doors" as such, but I do think it's not using the community to its fullest, and thus not being as open as it could be, and this does yield some discomfort - whether that's fair or not is something of a moot point.

I don’t disagree.


More information about the Standards mailing list