[Standards] MIX progress

Florian Schmaus flo at geekplace.eu
Wed Jul 6 12:15:25 UTC 2016


On 05.07.2016 11:10, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 5 Jul 2016, at 09:51, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
>> XEP development behind closed doors is not desirable.
> 
> To be fair, that isn’t what’s happening here, 

It was not my intention to suggest that this was the case in MIX. It was
more meant as generic statement. But I think it became obvious that
there are many parties interested in MIX development, which are unable
to follow the development process and, as consequence, are unable to
contribute to it.

> it’s just that Steve wants to double-check that the text reflects
> the Summit agreements before he submits.

Ensuring that the text reflects whatever was agreed on the summit sounds
more like a reason to make the text public as soon as possible, instead
of a reason to hold it back.

Ideally we have
- the latest development version of MIX available (rendered and raw)
- a page which tons of information (rationale, design ideas, discarded
approaches, ...) about MIX
- a meeting to discuss MIX development once in a while (e.g., every month)

But that's my wishful thinking.

- Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 603 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20160706/4442bac0/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list