[Standards] PAM Source Selection
georg at op-co.de
Wed Sep 7 09:20:59 UTC 2016
* Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> [2016-09-07 11:19]:
> It’s not clear to me that another stanza is necessary, and that this
> can’t come out of normal caps handling by the server. It’s probably
> not the end of the world to have one, but I think I would be inclined
> to start investigating things in terms of the traditional caps
> mechanism, and then upgrade to a new stanza when we find it’s needed.
> I’m relatively low-F on this (maybe 4ish).
I think the biggest problem with adding this to caps is privacy. You
don't want your MIX whitelist/blacklist to leak to third parties, and it
will be a significant amout of work on the server to rewrite all caps
and presence stanzas from a client to filter that out.
|| http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++
|| gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ ||
|| Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? ||
++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Standards