[Standards] PAM Source Selection

Georg Lukas georg at op-co.de
Wed Sep 7 09:20:59 UTC 2016

* Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> [2016-09-07 11:19]:
> It’s not clear to me that another stanza is necessary, and that this
> can’t come out of normal caps handling by the server. It’s probably
> not the end of the world to have one, but I think I would be inclined
> to start investigating things in terms of the traditional caps
> mechanism, and then upgrade to a new stanza when we find it’s needed.
> I’m relatively low-F on this (maybe 4ish).

I think the biggest problem with adding this to caps is privacy. You
don't want your MIX whitelist/blacklist to leak to third parties, and it
will be a significant amout of work on the server to rewrite all caps
and presence stanzas from a client to filter that out.

|| http://op-co.de ++  GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N  ++
|| gpg: 0x962FD2DE ||  o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+  ||
|| Ge0rG: euIRCnet ||  X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y?   ||
++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20160907/8b43baf9/attachment.sig>

More information about the Standards mailing list