[Standards] XEP-0359: Messages only?

Sam Whited sam at samwhited.com
Tue Aug 8 14:17:17 UTC 2017


On Tue, Aug 8, 2017, at 04:09, Daniel Gultsch wrote:

> That's why I suggest to explicitly limit the XEP to message stanzas
> (for now). If we in the future want to expand that XEP to more stanzas
> (and expand the rules on sanitizing fake IDs) we can remove that
> wording and bump the namespace.

This seems reasonable to me; we can always expand the XEP in the future
as new use cases arise, but we can't take features away (easily) once
they are widely deployed.

—Sam


More information about the Standards mailing list