[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0363 (HTTP File Upload)
mwild1 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 4 15:12:20 UTC 2017
On 4 December 2017 at 11:36, Jonas Wielicki <jonas at wielicki.name> wrote:
> On Montag, 4. Dezember 2017 09:53:59 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
>> I was considering to just move it up by one level. Validation may or
>> may not be an issue but I figured some libraries won't have a
>> getExtension or getChildren method on the error class if they don't
>> expect the class to have children.
>> Are there any other examples of XEPs 'extending' the error element?
> FWIW, the semantics of "it can be retried later" are essentially encoded in
> Extending the error element in this way feels weird, because as you say it is
> not a condition but an instruction, and implementations won’t expect this.
Agreed. This is exactly what the error types are for.
More information about the Standards