[Standards] CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Mon Feb 6 12:03:15 UTC 2017

On 6 Feb 2017, at 12:01, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:44:49 +0100
> Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:
>> Maybe I don't understand the question, but Bind2 still does resource
>> binding.
> Yes, but in a different way. While RFC6120 tells how to *exactly* bind
> a resource:
>> the client MUST bind a resource to the stream as described in the
>> following sections
> Furthermore, XEP-0198 already violates this requirement on
> stream resumption.

Nothing stops further specs from changing the core rules by negotiation. This is not a violation, it’s agreeing to do something different.


More information about the Standards mailing list