[Standards] CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 12:25:15 UTC 2017


Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:03:15 +0000
Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:

> Nothing stops further specs from changing the core rules by
> negotiation. This is not a violation, it’s agreeing to do something
> different.

I guess that's your opinion? Or where is it stated in the RFC? <bind
xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/> is a mandatory-to-negotiate
feature (at least if included), thus, clients MUST NOT ignore it.


More information about the Standards mailing list