[Standards] CSI and Carbons state after SM resumption
kevin.smith at isode.com
Mon Feb 6 14:57:10 UTC 2017
On 6 Feb 2017, at 12:25, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:03:15 +0000
> Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
>> Nothing stops further specs from changing the core rules by
>> negotiation. This is not a violation, it’s agreeing to do something
> I guess that's your opinion? Or where is it stated in the RFC? <bind
> xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind'/> is a mandatory-to-negotiate
> feature (at least if included), thus, clients MUST NOT ignore it.
Not really, that’s just how extensions work.
More information about the Standards