[Standards] RFC 6120 vs. XEP

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Feb 7 17:17:37 UTC 2017


On 2/7/17 9:18 AM, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> Tue, 7 Feb 2017 09:57:07 -0600
> Sam Whited <sam at samwhited.com> wrote:
>
>> The rules for required stream features say that if multiple required
>> features are listed, the client picks between them. In this case,
>> clients that support it would simply pick the new bind mechanism and
>> 6120 is perfectly satisfied.
>
> Indeed (section 4.3.2). Then we're ok here *if* we make Bind2
> mandatory-to-negotiate.

Yes, this is an important part of the story!




More information about the Standards mailing list