[Standards] RFC 6120 vs. XEP

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 20:42:35 UTC 2017

Wed, 8 Feb 2017 20:06:19 +0100
"Ruslan N. Marchenko" <me at ruff.mobi> wrote:

> RFC restricts nowhere 
> binding process to this extension

Actually it does, Section 14.4:

> A URN sub-namespace for resource binding in the Extensible Messaging
> and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is defined as follows.  (This namespace
> name adheres to the format defined in [XML-REG].)
> URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-bind

Here, the word "extension" is omited, so it will be harder to juggle
with words pretending you're making an argument ;)

More information about the Standards mailing list