[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Feb 16 17:28:34 UTC 2017


On 2/16/17 10:02 AM, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Ruslan N. Marchenko <me at ruff.mobi> [2017-02-13 19:30]:
>>> As there was no consensus two years ago, I just added both elements to
>>> 0280 in https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/382
>>
>> Thanks for clarification, but then still, why two? if <private/> is still
>> required to avoid bump, why not to stick to that? Especially if, as it was
>> pointed out in referenced thread - they have different semantic, but XEP
>> expects them to provide same outcome within specification/implementation.
>
> As I wrote earlier, the discussion did not lead to a consensus. Adding
> both was an attempt to get it moving again, or at least to create a
> state with the widest possible compatibility.
>
> My personal stance would be: discard <private/>, reference 334, be done
> with it. However, that would probably require a namespace bump.

Agreed that we need to get off the fence about it. :-)

Is Georg's proposal something we can't live with?

Peter




More information about the Standards mailing list