[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0352 (Client State Indication)

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Thu Feb 23 13:37:50 UTC 2017


On 8 February 2017 at 23:07, XMPP Extensions Editor <editor at xmpp.org> wrote:
> 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol?

Yes. A number of private extensions have been filling this gap.

> 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and requirements?

Yes.

> 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not?

Yes, ultimately.

> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?

No.

> 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?

Not in parts.

Beyond the typo in Example 4 (baCLony), there is constant use of some
made-up word with no reference as to what it might mean.

Dave.


More information about the Standards mailing list