[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0280 (Message Carbons)

Ruslan N. Marchenko me at ruff.mobi
Thu Feb 23 20:35:21 UTC 2017


On 23.02.2017 08:36, Sam Whited wrote:
>
> I *think* I'm against continuing to reference 0334 here. While this
> hint is theoretically useful for other specs (eg. if there were some
> kind of pubsub-MAM-sync in the future that replaced carbons), I'm not
> sure we need to try and make it that reusable, and having it live in
> the spec that it's used for makes more sense to me (one less thing I
> have to click through to and read when implementing). I don't think it
> would greatly increase the complexity or length of this spec to
> include it, and I'm half convinced that 0334 needs to be split up and
> deprecated (it just feels like a lot of random stuff that doesn't
> belong together, but we can discuss that over on its thread), so I
> don't think this spec should rely on it.
>
> I am a fan, however, of deduplicating and only having one hint (I
> don't really care which, or what it's called; <private/> sounds good
> to me just because it's already in the spec).
>
Fully agree, from first to last word.


More information about the Standards mailing list