[Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) and sorting out co-existence of MUC and MIX on a single domain

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Tue Jan 10 14:37:22 UTC 2017



On 10/01/2017 14:27, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 10 January 2017 at 13:30, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
>> On 10/01/2017 12:05, Steve Kille wrote:
>>> I have just issued a PR for MIX version 0.6.4.
>>>
>>> There is clear desire to have the option for  MUC and MIX to use the same
>>> domain.    The difficulty in achieving this was incompatible disco
>>> results.
>>> This version has made a change to
>>>     add node='mix' to channel disco that will enable the queries to be
>>> disambiguated.
>> I haven't been able to think of a case other than disco#items on the room
>> JID where MUC and MIX are likely to collide. This change doesn't make it
>> *easy* to implement both on the same domain, but I think it makes it viable
>> - please shout if anyone can think of other cases.
>>
> I agree. Further, I only know of a single client that would ever hit
> disco#items on a room, and that's Psi in its generic disco "browser".
>
Are you suggesting that this approach isn't necessary, and it'd be 
sufficient to 'break' disco#items handling for MUC-only clients?

/K


More information about the Standards mailing list