[Standards] bind2

Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com
Fri Jan 13 12:22:00 UTC 2017


I'm really interested in seeing the changes in bind2. Even if they are just
notes.


Best regards
Michal Piotrowski
michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com

On 13 January 2017 at 12:24, Florian Schmaus <flo at geekplace.eu> wrote:

> On 13.01.2017 10:27, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramtsov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +0000
> >> Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be
> >>> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just
> >>> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as things stand.
> >>
> >> What is bind2?
> >
> > It’s something I’ve got (loosely) specced up to deal with the issues
> around client history/unread/multiclient synchronisation by enhancing the
> initial resource bind stanza.
>
> Great! I know that many people, including me, are looking forward to
> something like that (provided what you did is what I've in mind).
>
> Any reason that prevents you from making your work you have so far right
> now?
>
> Also, Is there any reason not to switch the bind step from stanzas to
> nonzas while we make changes to it?
>
> - Florian
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: Standards-unsubscribe at xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20170113/a2084d2a/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list