[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com
Wed Jan 18 13:25:11 UTC 2017


On 18 January 2017 at 14:08, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:

> How many is many? I don’t see a problem with this scaling to any human IM
> cases that I can think of. Do you have anything in mind?
>

No, nothing particular in mind. Just wanted to make it clear if the spec
assumes the server provides complete list of unread conversations, no
matter how long it is.


Best regards
Michal Piotrowski
michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20170118/6eeb65ea/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list