[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Bind 2.0

Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com
Thu Jan 19 11:05:44 UTC 2017


On 19 January 2017 at 11:58, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:

> The other XEP is likely to say that a user can send an iq to the archive
> saying something like <archive-read xmlns… contact=‘alice at wonderland.lit> id=‘1’/> and the archive would then remember that state. When generating
> the unread list on bind2, the archive would send it for any jid that has
> sent a message to the user since the last read id for that jid. Does that
> make sense? (How the server stores that internally is up to it, but I can
> think of a number of sensible options, depending on the storage of the
> archive).


Yes it does make sense.
I already can't wait to see the "other XEP".


Best regards
Michal Piotrowski
michal.piotrowski at erlang-solutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20170119/2064b515/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list