[Standards] MIX use of type=groupchat?

Evgeny Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 07:42:34 UTC 2017


Mon, 23 Jan 2017 07:12:17 -0000
"Steve Kille" <steve.kille at isode.com> wrote:

> I don't think this is right.

And what about you previous statement:

> There would be a definite elegance in "using PubSub" everywhere, and
> an early MIX version was written this way

So you failed to build "elegant" solution and you don't think I'm
right?

> PubSub and MIX are both key XMPP services and have distinct
> characteristics.

Key? There is not even MIX yet. And pubsub usage is very limit at the
moment.

> PubSub is a useful building block for MIX and can also be a useful
> building block for other XMPP services, such as FDP (XEP-0346)

Yeah. If you build something which cannot be reused without ad-hoc
elements (and thus ad-hoc code) you can always say "it's a building
block".


More information about the Standards mailing list