[Standards] Jingle (XEP-0166): Missing unsupported-security action

Paul Schaub vanitasvitae at riseup.net
Fri Jul 28 08:10:19 UTC 2017


Am 28.07.2017 um 03:33 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> On 7/27/17 3:41 PM, Paul Schaub wrote:
>> Hi!
>> Jingle defines the reasons "unsupported-transports" and
>> "unsupported-application" that are used to signal, that one client does
>> not support any of the offered description types or transport methods
>> (XEP-0166 Examples 23-26).
>> First of all I'd propose to rename "unsupported-application" and
>> "failed-application" to "unsupported-description" and
>> "failed-description" to make it clear, that those refer to the
>> description component.
> Changing the names for aesthetic reasons doesn't seem worthwhile.

I guess you're right on that :)

> I have a GitHub branch where I was working on a large set of revisions
> to the Jingle specs, but unfortunately life got even busier for me and
> I've let it languish. If there's enough interest I can finish it off.

I'll surely take a look on that.

> Peter

Thank you for your feedback!

More information about the Standards mailing list