[Standards] OMEMO Key Agreement
remko at el-tramo.be
Thu Jun 1 06:05:26 UTC 2017
a lot of what Dave said about future proofing spoke to me and I'm
> starting to think he (and the others) are right.
Thanks for trying to see it from another perspective. My motivation
in this discussion has indeed always been future-proofing.
> It would become an
> Informational XEP (or maybe historical).
Given the multiple implementations of siacs, a historical XEP sounds like
a good idea to me regardless of the outcome of your current proposal. And
it might indeed take the heat of discussions.
> rolling the dice again and again until the key matches some
> criteria doesn't sound like something that should be in a standard.
> Client authors who are looking for a short term solution (and can live
> with the downsides) can implement OMEMO while all the protocol work
> would go into OMEMO-NEXT.
That sounds reasonable to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards