[Standards] XEP-0223: Clarification

Daniel Gultsch daniel at gultsch.de
Thu Jun 22 20:27:35 UTC 2017


2017-06-22 22:22 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
> On 22 June 2017 at 21:02, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:
>> If you take a look at example 13 of XEP-0357 there is a
>> publish-options form field called secret which probably counts as an
>> example of 'meta-data'.
>> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0357.html
>> If that XEP wouldn't register that form field a pub service that
>> advertises publish-options would reject it. (Nobody forces the App
>> server to do in fact advertise publish-options. And tbh honest it is
>> highly questionable why push notifications even use pubsub syntax but
>> that's a discussion for another day)
>>
>
> Good spot. Yes, publishing metadata rather than item metadata, then.

Does this mean you want me to change the wording of "it defines
METADATA to be attached to the item" to something else?


More information about the Standards mailing list