[Standards] OMEMO and Olm
remko at el-tramo.be
Thu May 25 14:37:55 UTC 2017
On 25 May 2017 at 15:53, Vanitas Vitae <vanitasvitae at riseup.net> wrote:
> So if that last part is resolved (which shouldn't be a big deal), then
> Andys PR would be an accpetable compromise for everyone, am I right?
Don't forget the other part of your mail: if it also comes with one of your
2 other proposals (split ed25519/curve25519 identity keys, or (widespread)
licensed implementation of XEdDSA)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards