[Standards] OMEMO and Olm

Remko Tronçon remko at el-tramo.be
Thu May 25 14:37:55 UTC 2017

On 25 May 2017 at 15:53, Vanitas Vitae <vanitasvitae at riseup.net> wrote:

> So if that last part is resolved (which shouldn't be a big deal), then
> Andys PR would be an accpetable compromise for everyone, am I right?

Don't forget the other part of your mail: if it also comes with one of your
2 other proposals (split ed25519/curve25519 identity keys, or (widespread)
licensed implementation of XEdDSA)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20170525/6ec73c27/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list