[Standards] OMEMO and Olm

Daniel Gultsch daniel at gultsch.de
Sat May 27 15:00:53 UTC 2017


2017-05-27 16:49 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
> On 27 May 2017 at 15:48, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:
>> 2017-05-27 16:41 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
>>> You think Zom will introduce OMEMO? I seriously doubt that's possible
>>> in the current state of affairs.
>>
>> I'm not in contact with with the Zom developers. I don't know what
>> their plans are. I just noticed there is a branch [1] and some issues
>> on their issue tracker indicate that there is at least basic support
>> for OMEMO (in that branch)
>>
>> cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/zom/Zom-Android/tree/dev_omemo
>
> Well, that's precisely the kind of legal problem Remko predicted
> earlier, then, surely?

INAL. I presume when ever they distribute Zom w/ OMEMO it'll
automatically be GPLv3?

However this is not really relevant to the discussion since they are
currently implementing siacs-OMEMO and not ODR-OMEMO.
ODR-OMEMO can be implemented without using GPLv3 code.


More information about the Standards mailing list