[Standards] Delayed Delivery for CSI and possibly SM
flo at geekplace.eu
Wed May 31 07:21:25 UTC 2017
On 30.05.2017 23:33, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> 2017-05-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
>> (I'm open to adding a subelement to indicate that, but I can imagine
>> that might cause problems). Instead, that reason is currently derived
>> from the entity delaying.
> I took me a while to fully understand and appreciate what you are
> proposing here and I actually think that's the better approach.
> This way we could - if we wanted to - even tell a CSI delay apart from
> a SM delay.
> That subelement could be in the namespace of the XEP that adds it.
> I'm fairly certain that this shouldn't cause problems for any half way
> decent implementation.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 642 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards