[Standards] OMEMO Key Agreement

Remko Tronçon remko at el-tramo.be
Wed May 31 16:29:07 UTC 2017


On 31 May 2017 at 17:42, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:

> The proposed solution would pretty much invalid the OMEMO protocol
> audit (since important crypto parts are being changed)
>

If I give a solution that doesn't require *any* changes to libsignal (i.e.
the
compromise Chris Ballinger thought was fine), would you then still have
this
concern?

Remko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20170531/fb470553/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list