[Standards] OMEMO Key Agreement
remko at el-tramo.be
Wed May 31 16:29:07 UTC 2017
On 31 May 2017 at 17:42, Daniel Gultsch <daniel at gultsch.de> wrote:
> The proposed solution would pretty much invalid the OMEMO protocol
> audit (since important crypto parts are being changed)
If I give a solution that doesn't require *any* changes to libsignal (i.e.
compromise Chris Ballinger thought was fine), would you then still have
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards