[Standards] Renaming XEP status 'Draft' to 'Stable'

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Mon Nov 6 10:03:50 UTC 2017

On 1 Nov 2017, at 14:30, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> As to the second point, it would be good to define more objective
> criteria for advancement (e.g., no significant changes in 12 months,
> widespread implementation and deployment, no known security issues).

I’m not sure about making them formal criteria in our process, but perhaps having a think about what we want them to be may well make sense.


More information about the Standards mailing list