[Standards] Problems with IM Message Routing: Message Types
flo at geekplace.eu
Fri Nov 10 20:53:50 UTC 2017
On 10.11.2017 20:57, Georg Lukas wrote:
> We could separate routing+persitence from the message type as far as
> possible, e.g. by explicitly using the resource identifier:
> - bare-JID = all-clients + archive
> - full-JID = single client, no carbons, no archive, no redirection
> This would bring us closer to the initial RFC6121 rules, but wouldn't be
> quite compatible with the…
Which rules of RFC 6121 do you exactly need/want to bend or violate?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 642 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Standards