[Standards] Possible typo in xep 144

Diane Trout diane at ghic.org
Sun Nov 26 02:27:38 UTC 2017


Hi,

> Looks like a typo; good eye! Would you mind filing a pull request at
> https://github.com/xsf/xeps? It has an entity called
> "&LOCALFULL;"  and
> "&LOCALBARE;" that can be swapped out. If not no worries, I'll fix it
> tomorrow.

Preparing pull request

The next list items also had some typos.

"does to" in the following looks odd:

> (e.g., because the sender does to have presence or capabilities
information about particular resources)

I'm guessing it should be "does not".

And the next item after that has as the odd "to se"

> since it is better to se an &IQ; stanza

I'm guessing that should be "to send"

Hope that helps. 


More information about the Standards mailing list