[Standards] 0174 Serverless Messaging: Discovering Capabilities
stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Apr 13 02:51:26 UTC 2018
On 3/12/18 9:17 AM, Christian Schudt wrote:
> my original question quickly drifted away to a discussion about the use case of serverless messaging.
> But I feel my concern was not addressed:
> 1. Why can’t the receiving entity include its Entity Caps as stream feature as described in XEP-0115?
That would be consistent with
> 2. Why should we instead use disco#info? I don't consider disco#info in stream features an optimization which justifies the additional implementation overhead:
> - Deal with Entity Caps in TXT records. It's only to potentially know an entity's capabilities before having initiated a stream with it, right? Sounds ok then, but unreliable.
> - Deal with yet another stream feature which covers an existing use case: to know an entity's capabilities (Entity Caps, Caps 2.0, disco#info)
> - Nowhere else is disco#info mentioned to be included in stream features
I can't recall why we defined this disco#info thing but in hindsight I
agree that it's ugly.
> I'd prefer the following:
> The receiving entity includes Entity Caps in it's stream features. If not known by the initiating entity, it may request disco#info and proceed normally (verify and cache the result). Most, or even all of an existing Entity Caps implementation could be reused then.
> 3. Can the section be updated although the specification is final?
I would not object.
More information about the Standards