[Standards] Abolishing 'proposed' status for XEPs

Kevin Smith kevin.smith at isode.com
Tue Apr 24 15:25:23 UTC 2018


On 24 Apr 2018, at 16:23, Tedd Sterr <teddsterr at outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> > Another note: the council may generally want to advance a XEP but vote
> > not to issue Last Call because of outstanding issues. We don't have a
> > special status for that. I can think of a number of XEPs in that
> > category.
> 
> outstanding_issues 😀
> 
> (Though this doesn't seem entirely different from needs_changes to me.)

I wonder if keeping track of this within the XEP would encourage earlier Council review, instead of waiting for LC.

/K

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20180424/3a193908/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list